Leaqio.com
SecondWindGroup from patreon
SecondWindGroup patreon

[COLUMN] Welcome to the Era of IP TV | by Darren Mooney

🕑 Added 2024-01-15 15:00:30 +0000 UTC

Comments

Darren Mooney

Interesting. I would have assumed that, just like McConaughey and Harrelson were a draw for then-unknown “True Detective”, Jodie Foster (who is also a rarified movie star who doesn’t actually do that much these days) would be enough of a draw herself for “Night Country.”

Darren Mooney

Yep. Fun fact: because of the book it was based on, Frank Sinatra had to turn down “Die Hard” before they could cast Bruce Willis.

Aeryn Sunshine

IP “True Detective” was the reason that I sat up and took notice of the new show coming out, plus Jodie Foster is always a win.

erakfishfishfish

This reminds me of how the first 4 Die Hard movies were all based on books/scripts unrelated to Die Hard. Ironically, the first Die Hard movie was based on a book, but disconnected itself from the series the book was a part of. (As for other outstanding recent shows, AppleTV+’s Severence had an amazing first season and I hope they can keep it up when the second season finally comes out.)

Darren Mooney

I am probably unable to directly answer that question based on the terms of my embargo. I will say that the connection is not a literal or continuity-based one. It's more based on theme, imagery and - yes - dialogue. (Notably, despite its memetic status, this will only be the second time "time is a flat circle" is mentioned, but it *is* explicitly mentioned.) I'll push back a little bit on the finale, if only because I think the point the show makes is that the sorts of conspiracies that bind these communities together *are* Lovecraftian horrors - monstrous ideas impossible to fathom because acknowledging them would mean accepting that the world we live in is a convenient lie built on unimaginable suffering. It isn't literally a tentacle monster, but it captures what those tentacle monsters are. But that may be the subject of some future weekend article. "Fargo" is a great example. An anthology series, all from the same guy - Noah Hawley. All largely separate from one another, barring easter eggs and occasionally references. Quality varies dramatically from season to season, but it's distinctly of a piece with itself as it skips through time. (I am loving the fifth season, which wraps up tomorrow. Also adored the second, and really liked the first and third.)

Grey1

>>However, the show also feels like a nostalgic checklist of imagery from the popular first season: a recurring spiral pattern, some tentacle monster graffiti, an explicit reminder that “time is a flat circle.” So does it actually end up being more than an anthology mantle/short story magazine title, becoming a True Detective mythology? I guess the original concept of "any story you want to tell" was what broke the second season, since audiences didn't care for a second season that wasn't a continuation of what people liked to watch in the first place. But it's basically the same concept with shows like Fargo and American Horror Story, isn't it? Never watched those, I must admit. Was True Detective too early? It would make sense that no matter where the scripts come from, they can only turn True Detective into a brand/IP if there's something beyond an umbrella title that plays into a Unique Selling Point people remember and care about from the first season. And I guess the only time True Detective was a marketable brand was the beer can and the promise of supernatural stuff. I remember the final episode of the first season already crashing the brand because the supernatural angle was revealed to be a red herring, completely denied for a down to earth explanation. As if The X-Files had suddenly not only turned aliens into a lie, but the conspiracy as well. It was all just random incidents!

Darren Mooney

Fair, but I do think there's a reason that the only version of "The Twilight Zone" that really worked was the one guided by Rod Sterling, despite various attempts to reboot and rebrand. Hell, even Jordan Peele couldn't seem to make the brand work for him, and he's as perfect a fit as you could imagine.

Ryallen

As good of a show as Twilight Zone was and as insightful a human being as Rod Serling as, I think rotating out writers, directors, and showrunners for series like True Detective is ultimately the right move. An individual can be intelligent, introspective, and provide a unique perspective on certain issues but I'd rather run the risk of letting go of a single creative so other creatives can have a go at an idea the IP provides while the creative can go produce something else instead of keeping them on and bleeding them dry of a single concept. Of course this runs the risk of only hiring the one capable writer in favor of newer and less talented writers but I don't think that possibility is worth sticking with a single person for the entire run of a show. So long as the quality is kept paramount and the IP's central idea kept intact, we can only benefit from an influx of new but skilled creative forces behind these shows. I'd rather cast a wide net than a deep one, if that makes any sense, the depth will come with the people that are caught and allowed to work.


More Creators