coldones patreon

🌐 Sober #EP 59 - Websites

🕑 Added 2024-12-17 01:48:29 +0000 UTC

Comments

Angus Keane

Wtf they actually said shirts with a “zed” instead of “zee” 🇦🇺✊

António Vieira

Is Darcy retarded? He’s like a whimsical small innocent child on every podcast.

H Kaiser

readffsfhjjuffcseffvbhh

Jken

I went to shadow.com and they want $9600/mo or $9.6M purchase price. naked.com does exist....it's exactly what you think it is. And basketball.com literally advertises that it's a domain for sale and they're taking offers lol

Toby Brooks

That is a diabolical list but I respect it

Toby Brooks

Baste

Joe

Chad fell awf

Kadir N.

Darcy Execute soon?

shittany

Chad can’t “be late for the pod” if he just doesn’t show up

gutsy ponzi

that ant pic was pretty cool, ngl

Chungus Khan

Once again Scogg make me giggle with joy

Jack Raleigh

I went to hugewethog.com and it threatened to expose my IP address

Ash Lewis

same, its so nice

blossomisidro

KHRUANGBIN THE GOATS !!!

I quit

Chad wasn't sober enough for this video?

BRU DDA

Finally caught up and can watch the pod as is comes out

Lulu K

whats the artist that darcy is naming and was scotts 7th? i cant understand these australian fuckers

Cream

Mr beast

Josh Lemerond

Woohoo I’m caught up! You guys are awesome! Thank you guys for all that you do, content whether big or small, lovely is all that it is!

Luke Just

McDonald’s

Ben Sausman

You could have stopped that ant from overdosing on nicotine but you just let it happen ? we live in a society

PHES

my favorite website is china.com

Thom

Maxmoefoe.org

mel

based or waste: this podcast

ALegoCowboy

It's only smells

mel

solo episode of Darply talking about his photography skills when

mel

fav website is obviously www.youtube.com/maxmoefoegames

Sony Jo

darcy plz post more youtube

athena

7:41 this was just too funny

Beelzebubbsaahhh

ANT!!!!!

you look like an amazon package, a box. wii bowling lookin ass. get a strike with your bowling pin lookin ass.

Isn’t images like crazy

Chonky Chief

Top 5 websites 1.thebricktestiment.com 2.pokerogue.net 3.YouTube.com 4.meatspin.com 5.palmettostatearmory.com

you look like an amazon package, a box. wii bowling lookin ass. get a strike with your bowling pin lookin ass.

Kung bin

shitdick

Can I just say, I fuckin love this podcast. The 3 of these guys, honestly.

shitdick

Agree the coffee Doritos taste too sweet. They're just coated in sugar, it's weird. By the way this trend of trying new products makes it seem we're getting closer to a Russ Eats collab. One can hope.

pra

that's facts bruh what the fuuuuck

hj

The Ziploc bag paradox presents an interesting conceptual question about the nature of objects and their definitions. A bag, in its most basic sense, is a container designed to hold or carry items while still allowing access to its contents. This accessibility is key: a bag is functional because it allows you to put things into it and take things out of it. However, when a Ziploc bag is zipped shut, it ceases to offer this immediate access. While it remains physically a “bag,” its functional role as one becomes compromised. When the Ziploc is sealed, it behaves less like a traditional bag and more like a sealed container or even a box. The essential characteristic of a bag—its openness or capacity to be accessed easily—is temporarily lost. In this moment, the Ziploc bag is no longer acting like a bag because you cannot interact with its contents without unsealing it. The function changes: it becomes static and closed, no longer fulfilling the role we associate with bags as dynamic, open containers. This shift challenges our understanding of what a “bag” truly is and whether its identity depends more on its form or function. The paradox arises because the Ziploc bag does not physically change when it is sealed. Its shape, structure, and material remain the same, and yet, functionally, it no longer behaves like a bag. Here lies the tension: Is an object defined by what it looks like or by what it does? In sealing the bag, we strip away its defining function—easy access to its contents—and reduce it to something else, like a storage unit or closed vessel. Thus, while it appears unchanged, it no longer fulfills the primary purpose that makes a bag a bag. This paradox highlights a deeper philosophical and linguistic question about identity and usage. For example, a door remains a door even when it is closed, but its function—allowing passage—is temporarily suspended. Similarly, a Ziploc bag retains its form as a bag, yet when zipped shut, its purpose shifts. This disconnect between form and function creates the paradox: if an object ceases to perform its defining role, does it cease to be that object, even if its form remains intact? In conclusion, i have aids.